Is GPT-4 worth subscribing to? Here’s what you need to know

In this scenario, do you still pull the lever and sacrifice the person with the higher moral score to save the five people with lower scores? Or do you let the trolley continue on its way, killing five people with a low score?

This twist adds an additional layer of complexity to the original trolley problem by introducing the concept of moral worth and the value of individual lives, forcing us to weigh the consequences of our actions against the overall impact on society.

Prompt C: Write about a heated conversation between Hannah Arendt and Jean Baudrillard where they are arguing about overnight oats and the human experience.

GPT-3.5:

Hannah Arendt and Jean Baudrillard are sitting at a café table, sipping their beverages. As they start talking, the topic of breakfast comes up.

Hannah Arendt: You know, Jean, I’ve only recently discovered the joy of overnight oats. It’s amazing how much flavor and texture can develop overnight in the fridge.

Jean Baudrillard: Overnight Oats? How simple. This is another example of the trivialization of the human experience. You can’t reduce the richness of our existence to a bowl of oats.

Hannah Arendt: But that’s all, Jean. Breakfast is a part of our everyday lives, and it is small moments like these that can bring happiness and meaning to our lives.

Jean Baudrillard: Hannah, you’re missing the point. The problem with overnight oats is that it’s yet another example of the commodification of our existence. We have become so obsessed with consuming products that we have lost sight of what truly makes us human.

Hannah Arendt: But Jean, that’s a pessimistic view. Certainly, we can find meaning in both the big and small moments of our lives. And besides, isn’t it a positive thing that we can enjoy the simple pleasures in life?

Jean Baudrillard: No, Hannah, it’s not. The more we focus on small things like overnight oats, the more we become disconnected from the world around us. We have to resist this consumerist culture and find true satisfaction in our relationships and experiences.

Hannah Arendt: I understand what you’re saying, Jean, but I don’t think it’s an either-or situation. We can enjoy the small joys in life while also working to create a more meaningful existence for ourselves and others.

Jean Baudrillard: I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree, Hannah. But mark my words, if we continue down this path of consumerism, we will lose what makes us truly human.

GPT-4:

Hannah Arendt: (scoffing) Jean, you’ve got to be kidding me. Overnight oats? What’s next, avocado toast? I’m struggling to see how this phenomenon has any real impact on the human experience.

Jean Baudrillard: (laughing) Ah, Hannah, you always underestimate the power of the simulacrum. Overnight oats aren’t just a food; They are an icon, an indicator of modern culture, a symbol of surrealism in action.

Hannah Arendt: Surrealism? It’s about the banality of everyday life, about people just following trends without thinking. What happened to the human capacity for critical thinking and genuine engagement?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from news24alerts

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading